Can PIXEL 9A’s battery exclude iPhone 16E and Galaxy S24 Fe?

Between Google Pixel 9A, Apple iPhone 16E, and Samsung Galaxy S24 Fe, we have deteriorated for flagship-tier features without price tag. Nevertheless, prices from $ 499 to $ 659 and a lot of differences under the hood, for your next purchase, there is a lot to weigh when deciding between these three.

First examined the performance of these three pluki mid-rangers (TL; DR: iPhone 16E and Galaxy S24 F), it is time to see which is the best for battery life-and hope a little more. I feel great about Pixel 9A opportunities; Its new 5,100mAh battery is the largest of the bunch, but let’s find out if the reality matches the glasses.

Pixel 9A vs iPhone 16e vs Galaxy S24 Fe Battery Dheeraj Test

To test the smartphone battery life, we run each phone through a series of workloads looped with a certain 300-NIT screen shine, monitor the battery drain and then extrap the phone how long the phone will last for that particular task. Our tests track uses everyday web browsing, video calling, video playback and content capture uses.

Sadly, the suspected battery remains the reputation of the iPhone with 16E for life. This is firmly behind the group, except for 4K video recording and 4K playback tests, where it makes the Galaxy S24 Fegom the best. The most dangerous result is how behind the phone is in our zoom call and web browsing tests. Surely the most insult to activities, it scores a few hours behind Samsung’s head and also behind 9A in both cases. Widely, this means that the 16E battery of the iPhone can be just two-thirds, or less than its nearest rivals, if these are cases of your primary use.

The results are close between Pixel 9A and Galaxy S24 Fe, which depends on the work in the question, but it is clear that the 5,100mAh battery of 9A lasts longer than the 4,700mAh option of Samsung. Pixel 9A is the most frugal so far when it comes to 4K playback, web browsing and zoom calls – meaning it will last longer for most daily tasks.

Pixel 9A also has an edge when it comes to the content capture, which outlines both rival handsets and 4K video shooting times in the camera. The budget model of Google here lasts an impressive six hours, although the other two are above the five -hour mark.

Looping back to performance, Pixel 9A came a clearly finally during our benchmarking session, but it seems a boon for a more conservative performance profile battery life. Apple’s iPhone 16E is essentially polar opposite. It operates at a breakcone speed through our CPU benchmark, but this overkall performs battery life very quickly. This is not clearly ideal – especially when the phone is started with an average 4,005mAh battery. Then the Galaxy S24 Fe, which sits right between the two, offers solid performance from its 4,700mAh cell and very good battery life.

What about charging back?

In the best case, we are looking here about seven to eight hours of screen-on time (perhaps close to the iPhone 16e), which is good-but you will still need to charge these phones at some point. Unfortunately, none of these three phones support high speed charging if you need up quickly. The iPhone 16E and the Galaxy S24 Fe are capted at 27W, while Pixel 9A is limited to just 23W.

But peak power is only a small part of the story. The Samsung Galaxy S24 Fe is actually the fastest to charge to take about 75 minutes, although it is hardly that we call speedy. It also hits 50% and 75% battery capabilities faster than competition, taking 25 and 39 minutes respectively. Again, it is not sharp, but it will, given that you do not need to charge the phone on mid-day.

The iPhone 16E and Pixel 9A are comparatively glaciers, it takes about 95 minutes to fill from the empty. High peak power level of iPhone 16E means that it is 50% and 75% a Smidgen faster than 9A, taking 26 and 44 minutes of pixel 30 and 50 minutes respectively. We also recorded that Pixel 9A got somewhat hot during charging, colliding at 40.4 ° C-a minor warning for decaying battery health.

Google’s budget flagship is the undisputed winner, coming to the top of all our five battery tests. This is an impressive performance for $ 499 handset. The only defect is that the pixel 9A is slow to charge. Thankfully, the whole day’s battery life means that you can wait till evening and charge slowly overnight.

While Fe did not win our battery test, it is not far behind the Pixel 9A and will undoubtedly take most users through a demand without any problem. Given that it makes and packs faster and packs in extra performance, I am equally happy to recommend it as a solid all-air pick. However, it is more than Pixel 9A expensive at $ 649.

In any case, I could not really recommend inexpensive models of Apple for those with a daily schedule. Not only does this battery offer life that provides 5-6 hours mark for most daily tasks in anxiety-ignition, but is also slow for charging the phone back. As long as you marry iOS ecosystem, both Google and Samsung provide better battery life for almost the same price. The performance in the iPhone 16E has an edge, but it does not do much when you are taunted in an outlet.